|
|
Wat
Jan 7, 2016 18:53:12 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 7, 2016 18:53:12 GMT -5
 in the case of soul patch girl, razor > laptop |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 8, 2016 9:10:37 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 8, 2016 9:10:37 GMT -5
We have already concluded that it is not a soul patch. |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 8, 2016 9:41:18 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 8, 2016 9:41:18 GMT -5
we concluded that she was lying! |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 8, 2016 17:14:41 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 8, 2016 17:14:41 GMT -5
No, you concluded that. You never presented any evidence that it was a soul patch. |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 8, 2016 17:29:44 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 8, 2016 17:29:44 GMT -5
you never presented any evidence that it wasnt! in kun, soul patches are guilty until proven innocent |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 8, 2016 21:57:56 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 8, 2016 21:57:56 GMT -5
This is my courtroom, I say innocent until proven guilty! Now give me some evidence or stop arguing that it's a soul patch! |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 9, 2016 10:32:18 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 9, 2016 10:32:18 GMT -5
she doesnt have a shadow on other parts of her face, suggesting that there are no shadows in her universe. Therefore, its a soul patch |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 9, 2016 15:29:41 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 9, 2016 15:29:41 GMT -5
Where there is no shadow, there must be light. Obviously, some parts of her face are more protected from that light than others. |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 9, 2016 17:03:16 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 9, 2016 17:03:16 GMT -5
There clearly is no color in that universe, either. dont pretend to know everything about alternate universes. |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 9, 2016 21:45:49 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 9, 2016 21:45:49 GMT -5
that can easily be explained by the fact that it's simply drawn in black and white. |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 10, 2016 15:03:39 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 10, 2016 15:03:39 GMT -5
its not a drawing! its real! |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 11, 2016 9:04:17 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 11, 2016 9:04:17 GMT -5
Where's your evidence? |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 11, 2016 9:45:45 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 11, 2016 9:45:45 GMT -5
all the avatars are real. are you a nerd or something? |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 11, 2016 16:15:03 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 11, 2016 16:15:03 GMT -5
I am a nerd. And my avatar isn't real. In fact, the person in my avatar, who is not real, isn't even really a person. |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 11, 2016 16:21:17 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 11, 2016 16:21:17 GMT -5
thats very insensitive |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 11, 2016 20:00:08 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 11, 2016 20:00:08 GMT -5
No, he really isn't a person. He's a computer program that looks like a person. |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 12, 2016 6:27:15 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 12, 2016 6:27:15 GMT -5
how can you be so sure? |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 12, 2016 9:10:07 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 12, 2016 9:10:07 GMT -5
Because I'm familiar with his story. |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 12, 2016 11:25:53 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 12, 2016 11:25:53 GMT -5
but are you? |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 12, 2016 15:01:32 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 12, 2016 15:01:32 GMT -5
more familiar than most |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 12, 2016 15:09:36 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 12, 2016 15:09:36 GMT -5
so? |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 12, 2016 17:18:05 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 12, 2016 17:18:05 GMT -5
I know more about him than you do, and he is a computer program that was designed to destroy and re-create the universe. |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 13, 2016 7:03:07 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 13, 2016 7:03:07 GMT -5
i think you are QUITE mistaken |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 13, 2016 9:07:52 GMT -5
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Jan 13, 2016 9:07:52 GMT -5
About what, may I ask? |
|
|
|
Wat
Jan 13, 2016 10:03:20 GMT -5
Post by Walkerskaia on Jan 13, 2016 10:03:20 GMT -5
everything. you are very confused |
|
