|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 24, 2015 5:56:29 GMT -5
then what do you have in this suit?????
|
|
|
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 24, 2015 7:42:19 GMT -5
Who said there was anything in this suit?
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 24, 2015 9:39:21 GMT -5
you did
|
|
|
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 24, 2015 20:08:33 GMT -5
No, I said that I had something in my other suit. There is nothing in this suit?
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 25, 2015 6:49:08 GMT -5
im fairly sure that your suit contains threads???
|
|
|
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 25, 2015 7:41:14 GMT -5
But that is part of the suit itself. There is nothing in the suit that can be removed without causing damage to the suit itself.
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 25, 2015 8:51:54 GMT -5
you mean to say there is no ling in your pockets????
|
|
|
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 25, 2015 18:26:32 GMT -5
Nope. I cleaned it all out on my way over here.
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 25, 2015 19:52:38 GMT -5
you didnt us an objection emote!
|
|
|
OBJECTION!
Sept 25, 2015 21:05:04 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 25, 2015 21:05:04 GMT -5
Didn't I? I could've sworn I put it in there.
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 26, 2015 5:54:55 GMT -5
well ur dumb
|
|
|
Post by Planetbox on Sept 26, 2015 9:09:59 GMT -5
You spelled "your" wrong. Your argument is invalid.
|
|
|
OBJECTION!
Sept 26, 2015 9:16:49 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 26, 2015 9:16:49 GMT -5
Actually, they spelled "you're" wrong. Your argument is a potato.
|
|
|
Post by Planetbox on Sept 26, 2015 9:19:50 GMT -5
Don't be foolish! Clearly my argument is a sassafras souffle supreme surprise!
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 26, 2015 10:32:35 GMT -5
that isnt a type of argument!
|
|
|
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 26, 2015 14:35:25 GMT -5
And who are you to decide that? You're not the judge!
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 26, 2015 16:50:04 GMT -5
i actually am
|
|
|
OBJECTION!
Sept 26, 2015 17:50:24 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 26, 2015 17:50:24 GMT -5
That is incorrect! Keeby is the Judge, because he is the supreme ruler of kun!
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 26, 2015 19:33:48 GMT -5
keeby is an impostor. i am the true ruler! the chatroom is even named after me!
|
|
|
OBJECTION!
Sept 26, 2015 20:11:49 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 26, 2015 20:11:49 GMT -5
And where is your evidence? Otherwise this is all baseless conjecture.
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 26, 2015 20:13:56 GMT -5
i told you, the chatroom was named after me
|
|
|
OBJECTION!
Sept 26, 2015 22:38:40 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 26, 2015 22:38:40 GMT -5
I highly doubt that, considering kun stands for Keeby's User Notes.
|
|
|
Post by Walkerskaia on Sept 27, 2015 8:09:23 GMT -5
i highly doubt that, seeing as how my name is kun
|
|
|
OBJECTION!
Sept 27, 2015 8:46:32 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Monarchofmadnezzzzzz on Sept 27, 2015 8:46:32 GMT -5
No, your name is anagalmeshshu!
|
|
|
Post by Planetbox on Sept 27, 2015 12:42:28 GMT -5
I have no objections to this statement.
|
|